Request for Proposals (RFP): National Public Perceptions of Early Childhood Education Survey

Request for Proposals (RFP): National Public Perceptions of Early Childhood Education Survey

RFP Number: RFP-EGEA -National Public Perception Survey-FY24-001

Issue Date: October 14, 2024

Title: National Public Perceptions of Early Childhood Education Survey

Deadline for Receipt of Questions: October 23, 2024, no later than 3:00 pm

Deadline for Sharing Answers: October 27, 2024

Deadline for Receipt of Proposals via Email in PDF format to procurement.asas@irex.org email: November 4, 2024, no later than 3:00 pm

Anticipated Award Type: Fixed price contract Issuance of this RFP in no way obligates IREX to award a subcontract or purchase order and bidders will not be reimbursed for any costs associated with the preparation of their quote.

Important Note: Proposals must be submitted to procurement.asas@irex.org, otherwise it will not be accepted.

 

Section 1: General Instructions  

1.1 General Instructions   

Offerors wishing to respond to this RFP must submit proposals, in English, by the following instructions. Offerors are required to review all instructions and specifications contained in this RFP. Failure to do so will be at the Offeror’s risk.  

Issuance of this RFP in no way obligates IREX to award a subcontract or purchase order. Offerors will not be reimbursed for any costs associated with the preparation or submission of their proposal. IREX shall in no case be responsible or liable for these costs. 

Proposals are due on November 4, 2024, no later than 3:00 p.m., Jordan Local time to be submitted via email to: procurement.asas@irex.org with the RFP number referenced in the email subject line, as follows: RFP-EGEA -National Public Perception Survey-FY24-001.  Proposals must be submitted to the ASAS Procurement email, otherwise, it will not be accepted. 

The Issuing Office and Contact Email noted in the above table is the sole point of contact at IREX for purposes of this RFP. Any prospective offeror who fails to register their interest with this office assumes complete responsibility if they do not receive direct communications (amendments, answers to questions, etc.) before the closing date. 

1.2 Proposal Cover Letter  

A cover letter shall be included with the proposal on the Offeror’s company letterhead with a duly authorized signature and company stamp. The cover letter shall include the following items: 

  • The Offeror will certify a validity period of (90) ninety days for the prices provided. 
  • Cover letter (Maximum of 2 pages) to be included in the technical proposal sealed envelope/package. 

1.3 Questions Regarding the RFP  

Each Offeror is responsible for reading and complying with the terms and conditions of this RFP.  Requests for clarification or additional information must be submitted in writing via email to the Issuing Office as specified in the table above.  No questions will be answered by phone. Any verbal information received from an IREX or ASAS employee or other entity shall not be considered as an official response to any question regarding this RFP. 

Copies of questions and responses will be distributed in writing via procurement.asas@irex.org to all prospective bidders who are on record as having received this RFP after the submission date specified in the table above.  

1.4 Instruction for the Preparation of Technical Proposals 

  1. Technical proposals shall be sent in a separate PDF File than cost/price proposals and the file shall be clearly labeled TECHNICAL PROPOSAL: RFP-EGEA -National Public Perception Survey-FY24-001The Technical Proposal (maximum fifteen (15) pages) must include: a brief explanation about the firm with a particular emphasis on previous experience; a profile of the firm. Also, the technical proposal shall include the following contents: 
  1. Technical Approach: Description of the proposed solutions which meet or exceed the stated scope of work.  The proposal must show how the Offeror plans to complete the work and describe an approach that demonstrates the achievement of timely and acceptable performance of the work. 
  1. Past Performance: Provide a list of at least three (3) recent awards of similar scope. The information shall be supplied as a table and shall include the legal name and address of the organization for which services were performed, a description of work performed, the duration of the work and the value of the contract, a description of any problems encountered and how it was resolved, and a current contact phone number of a responsible and knowledgeable representative of the organization.  

  1. Official Documents: Provide the official Registration Certificate and Vocational License for the company. 

  1. Proposals: (Technical and Financial) are to be signed, stamped, and dated as stated in the Covering letters and submitted in PDF format. 

Section 2: Scope of Work 

2.1 Background  

In 2016, the Government of Jordan (GoJ) set ambitious goals to increase access to “quality early childhood learning and development experiences” to promote life-long well-being for the youngest members of its population (The Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan, 2016).  Achieving the GoJ’s goal would necessitate a multi-pronged approach, including the need to shift community mindsets and practices around early childhood development - key factors in the well-being of children early on in the life course (National Academies of Sciences, 2016; The Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan, 2016).  Notably, community beliefs, attitudes, and knowledge had contributed to low enrollment in early childhood education programs such as kindergarten, frequent family member use of harsh punishment against young children, and limited quality of home learning environments (Department of Statistics (DOS) & ICF, 2019; Hatamleh et al., 2019).    

Data from the few studies that have examined community perceptions of early childhood development suggest that promoting evidence-based knowledge, beliefs, and attitudes toward early childhood development could change children’s early childhood experiences.  In one 2015 study of 1800 mothers with young children (ages 0-5) across Jordan’s 12 governorates, 43% of mothers reported that they would engage more frequently in reading and other learning activities with their children if they knew that they were positively influencing their child’s development (Hatamleh et al., 2019).  In that same study, 37% of mothers reported that they would be more likely to enroll their children in kindergarten or nursery if they knew the educational background of their teachers.   

This survey seeks to build on prior studies conducted in Jordan and to support the GoJ to develop effective policies, practices, and educational programs by exploring the community knowledge, perception, and attitudes, regarding early childhood education among adults in Jordan. 

2.2 ASAS Description  

The Early Grade Education Activity (EGEA) ASAS “مشروع اساس”  is intended to advance national efforts to strengthen the caliber of pre-and in-service teacher education and improve Kindergarten through grade three (KG-G3) foundational and socio-emotional learning (SEL) skills across the Kingdom of Jordan. The EGEA will support the development of a locally led, high-caliber early grade system, linking pre-service teacher education (PSTE) and teacher in-service professional development, with the capacity to sustainably equip over 23,500 resilient early grade teachers and educator leaders across the Kingdom of Jordan to inclusively deliver enhanced curricula, teaching, and learning materials (TLMs), and assessments to increase learning (SEL) outcomes to over one million students over five years, including those most marginalized, and  use research and data to learn and adapt policies and processes to maximize returns on investment (ROI).     

2.3 Survey Purpose  

IREX is recruiting an organization with strong quantitative research capabilities and a proven high-quality, cost-effective technical and logistical approaches for conducting a population-based survey covering a national representative sample (Perception Survey).  ASAS will conduct a national Public Perceptions of Early Childhood Education survey in 2024 to better understand how parents and community members perceive early-grade student learning benchmarks, socioemotional, and well-being. The survey targets will be females and males living in Jordan aged =>18 years. 

The main objective of the survey is to provide insights into community knowledge, perception, and attitudes regarding early childhood education.   

The survey's main thematic areas are:  

  1. Access and equity (services and information, inclusivity, and social and emotional learning (SEL))  
  1. Quality (how the community perceives the quality of early childhood education)  
  1. Teaching and learning environment (Needs and priorities) 
  1. Participatory and accountability 

2.4 Scope of Work  

Asas expects to receive proposals reflecting on the following required tasks. As the offerors should be responsible for implementing the following tasks, Asas expects detailed information illustrating and describing how this will be implemented. 

2.4.1 Sampling Technique and Sample Size  

Asas intends to conduct a national survey (the survey targets will be females and males living in Jordan aged =>18 years). A representative random sample of the population across the Kingdom needs to be identified (Probability Proportional to size). The survey implementer needs to contact the Department of Statistics to identify the sampling technique and sample size.  

2.4.2 Survey Tool Development and Translation  

The ASAS team will design a structured, comprehensive questionnaire aligned with the survey objectives to generate relevant data. ASAS will be responsible for developing the survey tool in both English and Arabic. In the summer of 2024, the ASAS team collected qualitative data through focus group discussions to deepen understanding of the survey themes, thereby enhancing the validity, reliability, and effectiveness of the research process. 

The qualitative data provided insights into the target groups' context, influenced survey responses, minimized the risk of misunderstanding variables, and informed the development of quantitative questions. This process supported the design of the survey by identifying key questions, determining appropriate response options, and refining the research questions for the quantitative survey. By exploring the topic qualitatively, the team was to identify patterns and themes to improve the survey’s overall effectiveness. 

The survey implementer (bid winner) will finalize the survey tool in both languages based on findings from the pilot study. 

The survey implementer is responsible for developing a consent form to be presented to respondents during the data collection process. The form should clearly state the survey objectives, emphasize voluntary participation, ensure respondents' privacy and confidentiality, and provide the survey manager’s contact information for any questions or clarifications. After receiving approval from ASAS, the consent form will be finalized in English and then translated into Arabic. 

2.4.3 Key Personnel 

Offerors shall propose the minimum following key personnel to be assigned to the project. Complete the following table to illustrate personnel responsibilities and the level of effort needed to accomplish needed tasks. 

Key Personnel Chart

2.4.4 Surveyors Training and Pretesting  

A comprehensive training session must be conducted for the entire survey team, including data collectors, supervisors, and data quality assurance personnel, and the technical experts. The implementer will be responsible for managing logistics, planning, and executing the training and pre-testing activities, including venue booking, refreshments, printing of materials, and documentation. The ASAS team will contribute by providing technical expertise, background information, survey objectives, and content related to the survey tool during the training workshop. Training and pre-testing workshops should include: 

  • Theoretical sessions covered; research ethics, interviewing process, survey background and purpose1, sample, survey respondents’ eligibility criteria, and detailed discussion and explanation of the survey tool; 
  • Practical sessions: role play session to practice the survey tool 
  • Pilot study; practicing a real data collection with a random sample of adults eligible to take the National Perceptions Survey to pre-test the survey tool, enumerators' capacity, and methodology (offerors should include a description of how they will implement that; (at least implementer will conduct 50 interviews).  
  • Post-pilot session to discuss the result of the pre-testing with the survey team including data collectors, supervisors, and data management team.   
  • Evaluate the pilot survey data using descriptive statistics, bivariate, and correlations to identify potentially problematic items, such as many 'other' responses to a particular question, lack of variation in the responses to a question, or unexpected relationships between responses. 
  • The implementer will reflect the pilot study results on the survey tool and procedures for collecting data, and update and finalize the tool and method accordingly.  

2.4.5 Data Collection

Offerors will be completely responsible for collecting the survey data. Method details have to be clear in the offer. This part should include a recruitment plan, a description of data collection implementation, teams, supervision, data delivering process, and data quality assurance procedures (procedures to assure data quality during collection, transferring, coding, and management). The data collection process should be implemented simultaneously across locations.  

2.4.6 Data Coding, Cleaning, and Management  

Data coding and management processes should be implemented in parallel with data collection. Offerors have to include a detailed plan in the offer. All questions and responses should be coded and registered in a coding manual. Data Management should be completed after three days of data collection in maximum.  The data cleaning procedure needs to be mentioned clearly.    

2.4.7 Data Analysis  

Data analysis should be structured according to the survey questions. Survey implementer required to use professional (not Excel) analytical software (SPSS preferred) for data analysis. At least the following data analysis methods need to be applied (implementer will generate dummy tables, shared and approved by ASAS):  

  • Frequency response/trend pattern analysis 
  • Comparison analysis  
  • Triangulation  
  • Data disaggregation (minimum by age, sex, and location) 

2.4.8 Reporting  

The survey implementer will be responsible for developing the survey report in English and Arabic language illustrating the following sections: 

  • Executive summary (background, purpose, method, key findings, conclusion, recommendations) 
  • Survey methodology (survey objectives, sample, sampling technique, questions, training, data collection, and data processing) 
  • Survey findings (following the questionnaire sequences) 
  • Conclusion 
  • Recommendations  
  • Annexes (questionnaire, data analysis tables) 

The survey implementer will be responsible for developing a PowerPoint presentation in English and Arabic summarizing key findings in the report. 

2.5 Deliverables  

2.5.1 Planning and Preparation  

  • Inception report 
  • Recruitment plan with description of the team according to locations 
  • Data collection action plan with timeline published in Google form indicating location, date, time, data collector, and supervisor to track progress and capture information on completions, refusals, and alternatives 
  • Sample lists  
  • Propose structure of data tables according to data analysis requirements   

2.5.2 Implementation 

  • Training agenda  
  • Fieldworker training and pretesting workshop 
  • Training sign-in sheet   
  • Final survey tool in Arabic and English based on training and pre-testing  
  • Consent form in Arabic and English 
  • Pilot study report including results analysis and raw data for ASAS review before or during post-pilot testing 
  • Training guide developed based on training workshop 
  • Updated data collection action plan (Google sheet action plan daily)  
  • Weekly report (illustrate updates and progress) 
  • Survey results (data tables, data cleaning in Excel, and utilized analytical software)  
  • Survey raw data (Excel and utilized analytical software format) – raw data and cleaned data for analysis 
  • Codebook containing survey question, associated variable name, responses, and codes for each response (e.g., no = 0; yes =1) 
  • Data quality assurance report  
  • Data analysis plan 
  • Survey report in English  
  • Survey report in Arabic  
  • Survey results visualization using  
  • PowerPoint presentation in English and Arabic 
  • 1- to 2-page infographic of results in English 
  • Produce a short video illustrating key findings (why, what, how where)  

  • All deliverables will be submitted using ASAS/Mission branding and marking guidelines (protocol will be shared with the contractor)  

2.6 Survey Timetable

Survey timetable

 

Section 3: Evaluation Criteria

Technical proposal evaluation weight chart

Price Evaluation

The price evaluation will include:

  • Analysis of the reasonability and consistency of prices proposed.
  • Comparison of the offeror’s prices proposed and prices for similar services.
  • The budget should be comprehensive and leave no significant costs unaccounted for.
  • Verification that the budget figures are based on reliable and realistic estimates.

Prices deemed advantageous to IREX will support a best-value award of highly rated technical proposals.