Gendered manipulative information poses a pervasive threat, particularly impacting women and girls from marginalized groups and those in the public eye, intertwining with other social identities targeted by malevolent actors. Employed by authoritarian regimes, gendered manipulative information silences women’s voices in digital spaces, fuels divisive public debate, and undermines democratic principles and human rights.

In this report, we summarize and analyze contemporary recommendations to address gendered manipulative information across stakeholders, including government, civil society, social media platforms, academia, media, and political parties. While acknowledging the importance of key responses like collecting data, raising awareness, and improving regulation, we highlight several gaps, including an overall insufficient focus on preventative efforts and inadequate recommendations focusing on bystanders and perpetrators. The report concludes by emphasizing the need for global collaboration and the inclusion of strategies from adjacent sectors, such as technology-facilitated gender-based violence and violence against women in politics, to meaningfully address this multifaceted threat.

Key Takeaways

1. The Need for Cross-Sectoral Collaboration: Recognizing that no single intervention or stakeholder alone can effectively combat gendered manipulative information, the report advocates for coordinated efforts across government, tech platforms, civil society, academia, media, and political parties.
2. The Importance of Prevention and Root Cause Focus: There is an overall insufficient focus on prevention and a lack of recognition of the root causes of gendered manipulative information, including social norms and the enabling environment created by technology.
3. The Unique Attributes of a Gendered Disinformation Response: A critical but sometimes overlooked aspect of gendered disinformation is its strong connection to offline violence. To address this, proposed actions should be survivor-focused and trauma-informed, differentiate between different types of gendered abuse and harassment, and link to the broader impact of gendered manipulative information on communities and governance to engage powerholders in solutions.   

For more information please contact:

Katya Vogt

Elayne Deelen

Jocelyn Young